http://u.qdnx.org/file/rozzin-20160331T212435-guzspzh.html
Now... why to people think it makes any sense whatsoever to present the #GPL as a #EULA? What part of "You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or run a copy of the Program" do these people not understand? That's the text *in the `agreement'* following the "You must accept the terms contained in this agreement before continuing with the installation" header.